|
DO MANDATORY SENTENCES WORK?
Response to Clatsop County D.A. Josh
Marquis' Op-Ed, OREGONIAN, May 30, 2008, titled: DEBUNKING
MYTHS ABOUT MEASURE 11
Marquis' spin on M-11 deserves some common
sense questions drawn from Oregon's Public Safety statistics.
First, how is it we now have 17 prisons when we had 12 in 1995
when M-11 was voted in, IF Measure 11 was successful?
Secondly, Just 9 cents of every tax dollar
goes to Corrections? To be fair, Public Safety which
includes all Law Enforcement, is more nearly 11 cents of every
tax dollar. In 1995 we spent $1.7 billion. Today we
spend nearly three times that much.
Third, Instead of 60% of prisoners are
incarcerated for violent crimes, I ask, if as reported in the
Introduction to the State Budget several years ago, that 80% of
convictions were related to drug/alcohol addiction, this doesn't
seem a logical conclusion from what we know about how crazy
people become on drugs and alcohol?
I'd add that it was good of Mr Marquis to
alert us to what kind of an Attorney General we'd be electing if
we vote for Mr Kroger. Do we really want more of our young
people locked up in very expensive cages instead of spending
that money on treatment and education?
--Helen Solem, Editor
***
|
|
Dr.
McIver's Affidavit
Exert: I am a psychologist who testified in various states
as an expert witness in cases of alleged sex abuse. I said
prosecutors, including Lincoln Count's, sometimes took advantage
of nations hysteria about the subject to prosecute bogus
charges.
***
Our Ballot Measure man, Bill
Sizemore,tells us he
has 5 Measures prepared for the November Ballot. Two have
been accepted. One is to prohibit State and Local
governments to charge for improvements under $35,000.
The second on would prohibit dues colleced from public employees
be used for political purposes.
Bill also tells us he won his Appeal against the Teachers Union
that their $4 mil. judgment against him was denied. See
Attorney Greg Burns letter on the OREGON TAXPAYERS UNITED web
site. www.Oregon Taxpayers United.
But the Union continues to use their members' fund to continue
their punitive claim. For Public School
teachers to use their money in this way raises the question
about what kind of teachers would try to deny their employers,
the taxpayers, the right to vote?
Also, this same arbitrary, authoritative Teachers Union in
Washington State refused $13.2 mil. to enhance Science and Math
studies. The reason: the Union has the only say in what
teachers would be paid. The offer was to reward teachers
whose students performed well on AP exams. Perhaps
the Gates Foundation and Associates will consider looking into
how the Teachers Unions have gained this stranglehold and help
to devise on how to get rid of it.
***
|